AI systems are banned in the EU with 'unacceptable risk'


Bloc's rules on Sunday in the European Union use AI systems. The use of the use of “unacceptable adventure” or the use of US systems.

February 2 is the first Following Following Day I have an actAfter years of development, the European Parliament approved the previous AI regulatory framework in the last March. The act went to legal force August 1; And The moment is the first of the compliance deadline at the moment.

Details are listed in paragraph 5However, it is designed to hide the numerous cases that can interfere with the physical environment of the physical environment and consumer environments from consumer cases and consumer environments.

Underneath Bloc's approachThere are 4 stages of a broad risk. (1) At least one risk (eg, email spam filters) does not specify the rules. (2) There will be light exposure to the limited rules of the risk limit that includes customer service chatbots. (3) High risk adventure: AI will face an example of supervisory supervision for health care suggestions. (4) Unacceptable Risk Applications – The focus will be completely banned by the focus of the compliance needs of this month.

Some in unacceptable activities:

  • Used for ai (eg based on a person's behavior used for social scores).
  • AI, which makes a person's decisions manifest a person's decisions, or deception.
  • AI, which uses weaknesses such as disability or socio-economic status
  • AI is based on their appearance. Attempts to predict that committed crimes committed.
  • The AI ​​used to use Biometrics to spend time on a person's identity is to their sexual orientation.
  • In public places for Law Governmental Purpose, “real time” biometric data is collected.
  • AI is trying to pursue people of people at work or school.
  • AI is created by scraping online recognition databases from online or security cameras.

Using the above-mentioned AI applications in EU. The companies that will be used anywhere will be uninterrupted. They range from £ 35m (~ 36 million) up to 35 million (~ 36 million) from the waters (~ 36 million) or 7% of the annual bank fiscal year to 7%.

The fine is the fines of the British law firm and technical heads in May and Technical Chief Technology Chiefs of Technology, TechCrunch and TechCrunch will not dim for some time.

“On February 2, the organizations need to be fully complied with in August.” Who was that at that time? Who is the qualified authorities?

Initial commitment

February 2 last day is in some ways.

Signed over 100 companies in September I Pact I AIIt voluntarily voluntarily voluntarily voluntarily voluntarily voluntarily voluntarily voluntarily voluntarily voluntarily enabled to introduce the principles of AI. Amazon The contract with Google and Openaii

Some tech companies, especially Meta and Apple skipped PACK. French Ai Startup Be irregularOne of the common critics of the AI ​​Act was also selected to sign.

It does not follow the responsibilities of others who disagree with Apple, Meta, Mistral, Mistrain or Pact. Sumroy will not be involved in the nature of the prohibited use of the prohibited use of the prohibited use of the prohibited use of the prohibition.

“The main concern in the EU AI apps for organizations is clear.” However, the organizations have to meet with their latest dialogue with their lasting days.

Possible exemption

There are exceptions for many of the prohibitions of AI Act's prohibitions.

For example, Ed collect the rule of law in public places, for example. This exemption requires approval from the appropriate Governing Body. Except for these systems Depending on the person. The rule of law cannot be said to be “a disadvantage.”

The app expresses exceptions for emotions and schools for emotions and schools for emotions and schools for emotions and schools at work and schools.

European Union's European Commission; Added that further guidelines will be issued “In early 2025,” after negotiations with stakeholders in November, “but have not yet been published yet.

Sumroy also said that he could not interact with the provisions of the provisions related to other laws related to books. Clearing can not reach the year as the window approaches the enforcement window.

“It is important to remember that the AI ​​Regulation is not lonely,” said Sumroy. Other legal frameworks, such as GDPR, NIS2 and Dora, can create communication with the AI ​​Act and the potential challenges. Understanding how these laws match are important as understanding AI.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *