တနင်္ဂနွေနေ့တိုင်း NPR ည့်သည်သည် New York Times Prozzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzze သည်တနင်္ဂနွေနေ့ပဟေ colle ိဟုခေါ်သောရေရှည်နားထောင်သူများကိုမေးခွန်းထုတ်ခဲ့သည်။ While writing to solve without Too Many preparations are usually challenging even for skilled contestants.
Thus, some experts think that they are the potential way to check the problem of AI's problem solution.
In a New StudyUniversity of University University at the University of University at the University of University at the University of University at the University of University at the University of University. Researchers at Weneslin College are praised by Wellesley College. They said that their experiments were referred to, O1, O1, O1, O1, O1, O1, O1, O1, and O1, “Given” and Sometimes they create amazing insight to make answers and answers and answers that they do sometimes.
In the study, the computer scientist Arjun Gra has we want to invent the problems with problems that people want to understand only in common knowledge.
AI Inding is in a few benchmarking quandary at the moment. Most of the tests that are often used to evaluate the skills such as Phd mathematics and scientific questions that are not related to the average user, do not apply to the average user. Meanwhile, many standards – even Examples Recent Benchmarks – rapid Satration Point approaches.
The advantages of the public radio-inquest of the public radio-inquest with the Sunday puzzle is not testing for ESOTERIC knowledge.
“I think it's hard to make a meaningful growth in a particular meaning when it can solve it.” This requires combination of insight combination and cancellation process.
No basic standards are perfect. The Sunday puzzle is the only US dollar and English. The scissors are often publicly available, and models have trained them.
“Every week you can release the new questions each week and expect the latest questions to be realized,” he added. “We intend to track how we changed the role of the Sample and changed over time.”
Researchers in the basic standards of researchers with about 600 Sunday Passites are beyond the rest of the models, such as O1 and B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B BLEDSEK's R1. Reasonable models check themselves before the results are Avoid some traps This typically up AI models. About the deals about the answers. It takes a little longer to take better ideas for a long time – usually takes a few minutes.
At least one model, Deepsek's R1 has known that the solutions are mistaken for the Sunday puzzle questions. R1 will declare “I will give up.”
As the models give the wrong answers to the wrong answers to the restrictions for the immediate lifting of other strange choices, and they come to the correct answer, or they will immediately take the correct answer to the answers, but they take an alternative answer to the correct answer.
“In difficult problems, R1 text says 'disappointment'. “It is a pleasure to know how a person is imitating a person what a person is saying. Reasoning in account of 'depression' can affect the quality of the good example of the good example.
The current best function on the current Benchmark is 59% of 59% of the score, and has recently issued o3-mini Specify the high “reasoning effort” (47%). (R1 is only 35%).
“You do not need a doctorate to be good at reasoning. In addition, a Benchmark is unlikely to understand the extensive researchers and to understand the results.