The expert suggests that the Iron Dome needs “something completely different” to deal with distant threats


President Donald Trump is seeking to strengthen the defense of the American homeland with a US -style iron missile system. However, one expert believes that a system similar to Israel is “not needed”.

“So I first tell you, the President uses the term” iron dome “as a metaphor,” said a rocket scientist.Morning with Maria“Monday”. This is suitable for defending Israel from Gaza, Lebanon, which is not what the United States needs very much. ”

In the first few weeks of Trump's presidency, he signed executive orders, one of which in building a American Iron Dome. The order is the need to execute the next -generation missile defense shield to protect the homeland “against ballistic missiles, HPRP, advanced maritime travel and other next -generation air strikes” as well as “most peace targets through power.”

5 things you need to know about President Donald Trump's “Iron Dome” program for America

Sucker explained that when it comes to missiles, the United States needs a wider system than Israel to face distant opponents.

The rocket scientist weighs in the executive order of Trump Iron Dome

Ari Saicher's rocket scientist says an American iron dome should be different from the Israeli system. (Pictures of Gitti)

To defend the US homeland, as the president wants to do, you need something completely different. “You defend against Missiles that have not been launched from Canada or Mexico … You potentially defend against missiles launched from North Korea, China, and in a much more complex than (Iron Dome ) You need to shoot it. “

The missile scientist, who specializes in the defense of the missile, explains how the system could seem under Trump's President.

President is being investigated It is something that can probably be called space -based tracking. You nurture a bunch of interceptors in the exterior and the whole intercept occurs in the exterior. So if you want to call it a “iron dome” or you want it to call it a “person”, it doesn't make any difference, it is not an iron dome. “

However, the Sucrot believes that the chance of success is “great” and “the United States has great engineers and controversy.” The expert also cited threats that US missile defense could deal with more complex shields than the Israeli system.

“We are talking about Korea and West spots, even farther China. These are the threats that America should look at, our close threats.”

He continued by comparing these threats with the Middle East.

“Things like Gaza and HezbollahHe said, this is very small. “This is a minor US league.”

The Sacher also disclosed the main challenge while talking about missile defense systems.

“There is a completely new technology that is needed to do this kind of tasks. () The most difficult to believe or not, not interceptor, this is not the most difficult thing. .

He broke the various elements that must be aware of when working with the iron dome.

The sabore emphasized, “It understands what we call Sky image.” “You know when you shoot an iron dome. You know who shoots you, how many people, who is a good boy, who is a bad person.” What is this 777 landing at the airport? Bring it down. Imagine All of these in the outer spaceThere are more people and more to take care of them, and there are other things that can be mistaken, and you have to consider all this. ”

Get Fox Business on a move by clicking here

Emphasizing the importance of control, Sacker said that after the situation is resolved in space, the system could be applied to land use.

“If you can solve that problem in the outdoor space, you can use it for another category of control problems; fire control, electrical network control, everything … This is the secret: control.”

Read more than Fox Business



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *