Pet Herigan's representative, RN.C, comments on the need to increase US defense costs, US foreign policy, and the introduction of a Pentagon banning from issuing additional COVID-19 vaccine guidelines without congressional approval.
Elnanak The Ministry of Efficiency (DOGE) is preparing to pay for the Pentagon, where it plans to cover more than $ 800 billion in defense budget.
DOGE on Friday night in a post in x announced that the initial meeting with Ministry of Defense (DOD) as it starts your job.
The Fortress wrote: “Excellent starting with deptofdefense. We look forward to cooperating with the taxpayer's safe savings and waste of waste, fraud and abuse.”
The Ministry of Defense's budget is the largest optional part of the federal government's voluntary budget with $ 850 billion in the current fiscal year – although it is smaller than mandatory programs such as social security, medicler and national debt interest costs. This is an important opportunity to find cost savings and ways to improve the Pentagon.
DOGE team welcomed in the Pentagon but some of them remain skeptical
DOGE is expected to review the Department of Defense's budget. (istock)
Brian Clark, a senior colleague and director of the Center for Defense and Technology at the Hudson Institute, told Fox Business that focusing on the Ministry of Defense's innovation units may be the starting point of the DOGE.
The Ministry of Defense has created “innovation cells” throughout the sector, which aims to help accelerate Integration of new technologies To the agency and the army, to some extent involved technical companies
“It literally is very scattered with dozens of innovation cells or organizations across DOD, and I think it is very ineffective. This type of scalable delivery of new and unusable systems in AI or new weapons near what The promises were not achieved. Focus. ”
Which NATO countries meet 2 % commitment to defense costs?
The largest USS GERALD R. Ford (CVN 78) passes through the Gibraltar Strait, January 5, 2024. (US Navy Photo by Jacob Mattingly / Dvids / Fox News)
He also to programs such as F-35 Strike Fighter And carrier Ford -class planes that are big and capital -capital efforts and “can try to get those back or contact them to release the money they go to new technologies . ”
Other emerging programs that are less stabilized but can be examined include the new Navy Class Class Class and new aircraft to identify new army.
“Each service has some white elephants that can easily be dog goals, and as expensive, tangent programs that do not necessarily provide the main responsibilities of this sector are understood, and this money can be understood. He said better for drones and illegal systems and artificial intelligence.
The US Air Force, Navy and Navy of the F-35 Lightning II are also known as a joint strike fighter. ((US National Guard Photo by Tech. SGT. Adam Keele / 168th Wing / DVIDS) / Fox News)
Jim Finn, an assistant to National Security and European Affairs at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox Business that high-profile defensive programs may be inefficient, but important capabilities such as the F-35, B-21 Raider Steal Bomber or Ford Offers carriers should not necessarily be completely cut. He to the Sentinel Air Force program to replace the Intercontinental III (ICBM) as part of Trilogy As a similar example
“Sentinel also comes to mind as a vital program without poverty. While these programs have huge budget problems and inefficiency, cutting them is not completely an option. If we do not have these poverty programs Our army will be in it much worse.
“The better option than cutting or pausing these programs is to look at the programs separately and make them more efficient. The long -term solution is to change the contracting process away from the cost,” he said. “Many military contracts plus (or thus functional), which encourages inefficiency in these programs because the government is repaying costs, so companies have no incentive to reduce costs. Fixed prices are probably the best way to deal with this long -term.
He also said that the Ministry of Defense's research and development processes that have no tangible relationship to improve the military readiness could be DOGE.
“There is a lot of what I call” scientific experiments “where it does not add enough value to the army. Finn said,” Most of those part does not provide meaningful benefits to the army. “
The Ministry of Defense's preparation processes can be the focus of DOGE cost efforts. (US Navy Photo by Andrew Langolf Third Class Mass Department / Dvids / Fox News)
In Defense budget It is traditionally one of the two -way and two -way processes in Congress. The annual lawmakers pass the National Defense Defense Act (NDAA), which determines policies and permits their costs, as well as a allocation bill that provides budget for each fiscal year for the Department of Defense Slow.
Because of having a congress of wallet power and defense budget set by law may be for Trump administration To make unilateral changes in some programs or by trying to cut them thoroughly or plan the funds to another DOD activity.
Get Fox Business on a move by clicking here
“It really depends on the type of programming change, and with how much. The apparent cancellation programs may not be possible in all cases; the smaller planning is very possible, especially for lower specifications with research and development or development programs Programs in their early stages. ” Finn said.