The best fast charger for 2025


Meanwhile, as one of the rare 140-watt adapters in the market, the Apple brick is very fast and did, as expected, excellent work on refueling MacBook Pro. Nevertheless, I must mention that this is the only brick in this segment that comes with one port that feels like an lost opportunity for the Apple ecosystem. For those who need additional flexibility, wireless charging options should be considered, although they may not offer the same speed as the wired connectors.

So for anyone who wants a charger that can quickly replenish the ultraced laptop, at the same time having a spare juice, I prefer Gan's Gan adapter from RazerThe field is the best charger in this category, as well as the smallest and most expensive for $ 180. In addition, it comes with two international wall adapters (for the UK and the EU) and the wicker with a 100-watt USB-C cable, which you do not receive from others in this category. If you need a reliable electricity bank or a fast charger on the go, this may be a good investment.

Our best elections for three output power ranges are Anker 711, Anker 715 and Razer 130-Watt Gan Charg. Our best elections for three output power ranges are Anker 711, Anker 715 and Razer 130-Watt Gan Charg.

Sam Rutherford/Endaget

Obviously, there are much more in the market than 14 super -fast charging devices, and, unfortunately, I do not have time to check them all. Nowadays, the discharge of the phone from the 100 percent battery to the dead can take more than 15 hours, so depending on the device I can check only one USB -grown device per day. Just the collection of all these data took most of the two months. And, unfortunately, while I was holding this test, anchor I went out with the new generation of power adapters that I still had no way to evaluate.

However, there are several more important conclusions. Firstly, to ensure the optimal charging speed, you should pay attention to the standards of charging your device and a quick charger; Make sure your charger can provide an appropriate amount of energy. Manufacturers usually list the maximum charge rate of the device, while the power adapters clearly marify their types and outputs of USB. And in case of doubt, you can look at the most beautiful text on the charging itself, although you may have to do a little mathematics. Just remember that Watts is equal to Volts Times. In addition, in the case of adapters with several ports, you check how its total power is divided when connected to several devices.

Then there are other factors, such as the size and weight that you want to consider, with more new adapters of nitride gallium nitrium (GAN), often showing more compact structures and the best power efficiency. And if you ever really doubt it, you can just choose a fast charger made by the same company as your Android, iPhone phone, laptop or other gadgets, which is especially true for devices such as OnePlus 10t This is equipped with quick profilent charging protocols.

The methodology of my rapid charging experiment is designed to be as simple as possible. I poured each device up to 10 percent of the battery, connected a nutrient brick, and then recorded the amount of charge added every 10 minutes within an hour. Each adapter was connected directly to a standard 120-volt rosette (without the use of a power strip or any extension cords), and, when possible, I used a cable that was either turned on with a charger, or with the same manufacturer as the device. If this was not an option, I used certified 100-watt fast charging cables made by Anker, Apple and others.

Since the charging technology and, therefore, the rate for devices vary depending on how much juice I wanted to measure how well every adapter could correspond to the optimal charge rate of each gadget. As a rule, charging a phone is slower from zero to 20 percent before the speed increases until the battery reaches 80 percent, after which everything slows down again to protect and maintain the health and durability of the power cell. For charging stations with several ports, I always chose a port with the highest power output, and several devices are not connected.

Five devices that we used to test the chargers are the iPhone 13, Galaxy S22 Ultra, Nintendo Switch (launch model since 2017), Dell XPS 1321 and 16-inch Max MacBook Pro 2021.Five devices that we used to test the chargers are the iPhone 13, Galaxy S22 Ultra, Nintendo Switch (launch model since 2017), Dell XPS 1321 and 16-inch Max MacBook Pro 2021.

Sam Rutherford/Endaget

As for the devices themselves, I chose the Apple iPhone 13, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, Nintendo Switch (launch model since 2017), Dell XPS 1321 and 16-inch Max MacBook Pro. This assortment was chosen to cover a wide range of specifications, and power from 20 W (iPhone 13) to 140 watts (M1 Max MBP). In addition, each system was tested during idle (that is, without additional applications or games) to ensure consistent results.

One important thing that should be noted is that although the USB forum for the USB sales approved support for the USB Power Delivery (USB-PD) at a level of up to 240 W, adapters that actually support this output capacity do not yet exist. In addition, although there are several cables that can process more than 100 watts of juice, they are somewhat rare or difficult to get.

When searching for charging devices, you may notice that some are noted as GAN, which means Gaul nitride. This is an important difference, because, compared with older adapters that use silicon switches, GAN -based devices support increased power and output, which allows manufacturers to create more compact chargers that work with cooling and support higher power. Depending on the specific output power, Gan Charms can be 30-50 percent less and easier than alternatives based on silicon. This may not sound so much, but when they sit in a bag next to a laptop, a wireless charger, a fast charging cable, a telephone and any other accessories that you can have, reduction of excess mass and weight can be of great importance.

With such a large number of various chargers of various power outputs, I divided all into three categories. There are 30 W and under charges, which are mainly designed for smartphones and other small mobile devices. Then we move to 45-65-water charging devices (give or take watts or two), which can process things such as phones, as well as a number of thin and light laptops. Finally, we have chargers that bring 100 watts or more, which are good for almost anything except the largest and the most longs for the power of gaming laptops. Many of these adapters with higher power are also equipped with several ports, so whether additional devices can be filled at full speed. However, since not every food brick supports charging with several devices, I did not include this as a test metric.

You can see a complete list of chargers that we tested below:



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *