Prince Harry was treated unfairly when he was deprived of his British security details, his lawyer told court judges in London on Tuesday.
Harry, who rarely appeared in court at the trial, lost his security in February 2020 after the Royal Family member and moved to the USA
The Supreme Court judge ruled last year that the decision of the panel government to issue “inappropriate” security for Harry-designed to order based on his visits to Great Britain-was not unlawful, irrational or unjustified.
But lawyer Shaheed Fatima argued that the group that assessed the needs of Prince Sussex's security did not follow their own process and did not carry out risk management.
“The appeal does not accept that it means better to order,” said Fatima. “In fact, in his submission, this means that he has been awarded to various, unjustified and worse treatment.”
Harry, whose titles include Prince Sussex, had a navy blue suit and a light blue tie when he was sitting behind a lawyer. His unexpected appearance was a clue about the importance of the matter for him.
40 -year -old Harry, the younger son of King Charles, took over the convention of the royal family, taking the government and a tabloid press to court, where he has a mixed record.
But Harry rarely appears in court, performing only a few performances in the last two years. This covered the process of one of his cases of telephone hacking against British tabloids when he was the first older member of the royal family who entered the box of witnesses for over a century.
The claims that Harry and the family are threatened
Harry claimed that he and his family are threatened during a visit to his homeland because of the hostility directed to him and his wife Meghan, Princess of Sussex, in social media and by relentless persecution by the media.
He lost a related court case in which he sought the consent of private payment for police details, when in Great Britain, but the judge denied this offer after a government lawyer argued that officers should not be used as “private bodyguards for the rich.”
He also abandoned defamation against the Daily Mail publisher regarding the article that said that he tried to hide his efforts to continue to receive the security financed by the government.
But he won a significant victory at the trial in 2023 against the publisher of Daily Mirror, when the judge said that hacking the phone on the tabloid was “common and habitual”.
Prince Harry announces victory after the London judge says he was a victim of telephone hacking by the British publisher Mirror Group Gapers.
In January he won the “monumental” victory when Rupert Murdoch's British tabloids apologized for years for interfering with his life for years and agreed to pay significant compensation to solve the privacy process.
He has a similar case in progress against the Daily Mail publisher.