Tesla Whistleblower wins a legal battle against Elon Musk

The Tesla's Succa, who has been fighting Elon Musk and his company through the courts for years, wins the last round of a long -standing legal battle.

Engineer Christina Balan lost his job after provoking a safety problem in 2014 about the design defect, which can affect cars.

Her claim for slander against the company seems to have exhausted the path when a judge confirmed the arbitration decision rejecting her case – but judges of appeal in California in California has canceled this decision in her favorS

She told the BBC News that she now wants to face Elon Musk and Tesla in the open court.

Tesla did not answer a request for comment.

Da Balan said he believes that now the case will return to the square first and new production can be started.

“We hope we will start a new case and have the chance to take over Elon Musk in front of the jurors and a judge,” she said.

The engineer was once so prominent in Tesla that her initials were engraved on the batteries inside Model S.'s cars.

In an interview with BBC News last year, She said she was determined to prove her innocence in the name of her son.

She also revealed that she was a remission of breast cancer at Stage 3B and her biggest concern was that she could not live to see her last day in court.

Da Balan claims that she is worried that carpets twist under some pedals in Tesla models, creating a danger of safety.

She said the managers rejected her concerns, became hostile and she lost her job.

She then won an unlawful dismissal case – but this turned out to be the beginning of a long trip through the courts.

Da Balan was publicly accused by Tesla for using her resources for a “secret project” – accusations that constitute misappropriation, a crime under US law.

She consistently denied the prosecution and decided to file a slander case against the company in 2019.

“I want to clear my name,” she told BBC News last year.

“I wish Elon Musk would have the decency to apologize.”

Then the court ruled that the case of D -jja Balan should be subject to arbitration for a contract that she signed while working for Tesla.

The arbitrator, discovered in favor of the company and Muska, rejecting its claims due to the limitation of California for restrictions – which means that it has passed too much time after the alleged defamatory statements have been made.

Tesla remanded the case to the California District Court to confirm the decision.

However, Balan Balan appealed this decision and judges from the US Court of Appeal for the ninth round found in its favor – in fact, deciding that the California court would not have the jurisdiction to make its decision.

They have ordered that the arbitration award be annulled and the district court to dismiss the claim due to the lack of jurisdiction.