Researchers at Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon University Recently published a study Using a specialist in the workplace see how important it affects important ideas.
“Technologies that use improper technologies can cause degradation of the ability to maintain.
When people rely on Generative AI, their efforts are good for using AI's response skills instead of using AI's response skills, such as analysis and analysis. If If the response of AI's responses only if the responses are not enough, workers are “the rights of routine opportunities and their conscience.
In other words, when we think of AI, it is getting worse to solve problems for us to think of AI.
In this study, 31 examples of respondents used by the 31 examples of respondents used in the workplace in the study of 31 examples of participants in the study of at least once a week. For example, a partner, information, information (researching a title of the topic or an article in the article); And the advice (making a chart from existing data to existing data). Then, when they did the work, they asked if they were applying the ability to think critical.
About 36% of participants use important ideas that can reduce the potential results from using AI. A participant said she used the chatgpt to review the entertainment. He said that he would send him to the boss that he would send him to the boss to send him to the rich man. And in many cases, The participants confirm the AI-Generated reactions with more general web browsing resources such as YouTube and Wikipedia.
We need to understand how the website is going to compensate to compensate the website of AI's weaknesses for workers. But all the participants are familiar with the limits of AI.
“The ideas that affect the limits of Genai Responses can stimulate critical thinking.
In fact, those who show confidence in AI are less powerful than those who are confident in their ability.
Researchers study against the fact that the Generation Ai Tools are angry against the fact that they are angry.