There is a doordash Ask the court to dismiss The lawsuit filed by Uber in February, calling him his merit and “cynical and calculated tactics.” Uber sued the largest supplier of food in the United States at the beginning of this year, Accusation It exerts pressure on restaurants to use its services exclusively. At that time, Uber said that he heard from “restaurants throughout the country”, that Doordash was charging from higher tariffs for commission in restaurants, which also sell their food on Uber Eats. He also accused Doordash of the threat to overcome restaurants on his lists if they are also available in the Uber Eats app. But in his sentence about dismissal, Doordash said that Uber’s lawsuit is not about protecting competition, but about how it is avoided.
The supplier of food delivery claimed that Uber “could not offer merchants, consumers and couriers to high -quality services” that he provides, so Uber “resorted to the approval of immortal legal claims” instead of competing according to his own dignity. In his proposal, he wrote that Uber's complaint was “rooted in an erroneous view”, that he must change his business practice, which, in her opinion, is a concentrable one in order to give way to Uber business. However, the company explained that the law “is associated with the protection of competition, not competitors.”
Meanwhile, Uber said Techcrunch This is Doordash “It was difficult to understand” his complaint. “When restaurants are forced to choose between unfair terms or retribution, this is not competition – this is coercion,” the representative said. The Supreme Court of the County of San Francisco, California, must hear Uber's lawsuit on July 11.