Thursday, Thursday Gemini 2.5 ProPublished by Google Technical Report Showing results of its internal safety assessments. However, the report includes the details on the details.
Technical reports are useful: ImperfectionSometimes facts that companies are not always widely advertised about their AI. The AIDS views these reports as good faith efforts to support independent research and safety assessments.
Google has already received a security reporting approach to some of its competitors, and the release of technical reports has been graduated from the platform. The company does not include findings from all its “dangerous capacity” assessments. Its those deposit for a particular audit.
Experts TechCrunch is discouraged by the misses of the Gemini 2.5 Pro Report, but they noticed that they noticed Google's noticing Google Frontier Safety Framework (FSF). Last year, the FSF introduced the FSF last year and introduced the future AI capacity to identify future AI capabilities.
“This (report) is very low. It is not possible to confirm that it is not possible to live in accordance with the safety and security of the people.
Google said that Google was sadly reported to the report for Google 2.5 Pro for Google 2.5 Pro. Woodside announced that last time Google announced that year in June.
Google is not an inspiration of trust, but Google is not available Gemini 2.5 flashThe company announced a small company, a small, more effective form. A spokeswoman said that the report from TechCrunch by TechCrunch was reported “in a report that would come soon.
“I hope Google is committed to releases frequently updates,” Woodside told TechCrunch. These models may include the results of evaluation for publicly distributed models.
Moigz may be the first AI Lass to propose to model reports, but it is not the only one Is accused of Underdelivering for transparency Recently. Meta issued Skimpy safety assessment Of its new Llama 4 Open Models and Openai selected to publish any report GPT-4.1 series.
Hanging over Google's head guarantees large-scale technology companies to control the high level of AI security inspection and reporting. 2 years ago Google told the US government “Significant” public AI Models will be published in safety reports for “significant public” public “public”. the company Followed up a promise promise with similar commitments Into Other countriesThe AI devices promised to “give” transparency “.
AI's Senior Advisory Board of AI Society's Senior Advisor Kevin Bankston said that the AI Society of Democracy and Jude's path to the bottom.
“Labs like Labs, like Openai, have reaped their safety testing time on their safety tests before the release of the security test for months.”
Google says it is not detailed for technical reports in technical reports, but security checks and “the red team” are unable to publish.