Foreign Ministers of G7 countries overcome their differences on Friday Of Ukraine Regional integrity and warning Russia Accepting the seizure fire leads to following Kiev or more potential restrictions.
His joint dialogue led to a weekly tension between US allies and President Donald Trump over promoting Western trade, security and Ukraine policy.
Trump called on Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday to protect Ukraine troops from withdrawing from the region of Russia and said the war could end.
Trump held a long meeting with Putin Thursday night in Moscow on social media after his envoy, Steve Watkov, which Trump called “very good and fruitful”.
The Kremlin said Putin had sent a message to Trump about his ceasefire plan, which Kiev had agreed to “carefully hope” through Vaticov that an agreement could be made to end the three -year conflict.

Putin said Thursday that he has in principle supported Trump's proposal, but unless many important conditions are eliminated, the fighting cannot be stopped, which increases the possibility of prolonged negotiations.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters after the G7 meetings that after Putin's comments, the reason for being “cautiously” about ceasefire and peace talks was the reason, but would not pay attention to the terms he stated.
G7 officials feared that they would not be able to agree on any document that touched geographical political issues from around the world, about the divisions that they said they could play in the hands of both Russia and China.

Get Daily National News
Get high news, political, economic, and current issues headlines, which are provided in your inbox once a day.
Canadian Foreign Minister Melania Julie told reporters, “When different issues are talked about, in Ukraine and the Middle East, we have these various issues, articles, and its purpose to keep the G7 alliance strong.”
A group of seven ministers from the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States, along with the European Union, have been widely agreed in the past, for meetings on Thursday and Friday, in a remote tourist town in the Quebec hills.
But in the first G7 meeting of the Canadian presidency, it was difficult to walk in the Middle East and Washington's desire for harsh words on China, Washington's desire for Washington.
The Communican “confirmed his unwavering support for Ukraine's right to its territorial integrity and existence, and defend its independence, sovereignty and independence.”
Since the Trump administration came to power on January 20, Ukraine's territorial integrity has been largely absent from the American story. Under Trump, the United States has not yet ruled out the possibility that Kiev may have surgery the area.

Ukrainian President Wolodmeer Zelannsky said Friday that the area was discussed during a meeting of Ukrainian and US officials in the Saudi city of Jeddah, but it would require difficult dialogue.
“Regional integrity is an important factor of talks with the United Nations and (reference),” Kaja Kalis, the head of the European Union's foreign policy, told Reuters.
A text earlier in which the need for security guarantees was referred to to ensure that a war was changed by “assurances”, but he warned Moscow to agree with a ceasefire or to follow Kiev in facing further sanctions, including oil pricing hats.
“The G7 members called on Russia to agree and fully implement the ceasefire on equal terms.
“He emphasized that any ceasefire should be respected and the need for strong and reliable security arrangements should be emphasized to ensure that Ukraine can stop and defend it,” he said, citing Ukraine's territorial integrity.
British Secretary of State David Lumi called the statement “very good”.

Washington tried to impose red lines on the tongue around Ukraine to harm its dialogue with Russia, and Russia's so -called Shadow fleet, opposed a separate declaration of stopping a complex shipping network, while demanding a stronger language on China has been lifted.
Finally, the G7 also approved a separate statement on maritime security, which included a task force to deal with the Shadow fleet, which was emphasized by Canada.
The final conversation states that the G7 has been opposed against any unilateral efforts to change the stagnation in the Strait of Taiwan, whose power or repression is a language that will potentially be encouraging to Taipei.
There was a dispute over the language regarding Gaza and the Middle East, especially the concept of a solution to the two states for the Israeli Palestinian conflict, which led to the United States resisting.
The final version did not mention the solution of the two states, which is dropping the language, which emphasized its importance in the first draft of the text.
“He called for the essential part of a political horizon for the Palestinian people, which was achieved through the resolution of the Israeli Palestinian conflict negotiations, which meets the legitimate needs and aspirations of both the people and development, and both the peace, stability and prosperity of the comprehensive Middle East.”
With Global Global News and Reuters additional files