Guget Following on the heels of OpenaiIt is a good idea. The policy proposal was published In response to response to the call of Trump Administration in the National “A Action Plan”. The technology company is the protection control of the protection control of the AI's training and “balanced” exports and “balanced” consumption. “
“The United States supports the US values and needs to continue international economic policy to support the Innovation of Innovation internationally,” Gobe wrote. AI policy setting has been resistant to the attention that proportions in the construction of the building.
Google's controversial suggestions apply to the use of IP-Protected item.
Google complained that “fair use and data and data and data extraction” complained that Ai Development and Ai-Related Sciennical Innovation was “critical”. Like OpenaiThe company attempts to practice publicly available information, including the public information, including the public information, including the public information, and to find the opportunity to check against competitors.
“These exceptions are often difficult to predict with the users with data with data development or data holders and data holders.
Google there Report Trained Number of model It depends on public copyright information Fight Litigation With company owners to inform and compensate to inform them with company owners. US Courts have not yet been able to decide whether or not to protect Ai developers from IP laws.
Google also takes the issue in its AI policy proposal Some export control is set under Biden administrationIt is “that is the opposite of the description of the description of the description of the descriptions of Microsoft, such as Microsoft, such as Microsoft from Google competitors,” the ability to compete. It was “trust” It could “fully comply” the rules.
Importantly, the exemption of the exemptions for the reliable businesses that try to limit the availability of high-level AI chips in the worst countries.
In other areas, Google said: Reduce expenditures and remove the grant rewards. The company should provide datasets to commercial AI training.
The government urged the government to hold federal laws in AI, including the critical privacy and security frameworks, which were created by the state of the state of the state of state Amy law. The number of AI billing AI bills in the US increased to 781According to an online tracking device.
Google warns the US government to ban the impact of the US government to the US Systems of AI Systems in AI Systems. In some cases, modeling inventor complained about how the inventor uses the form.
Historically, Google has opposed the laws like SB 1047 SB 1047 in California Clearly put out An AI developer should take precautions that a model should be made before the model is released.
“A developer is more likely to understand the dangers of destroyers who are destroyed in direct places directly to those who are directly provided.
EU also called the EU asks for the emergence of the EU, as it is as demanding as “very widely considered demands.
In regard to how the growing countries and states work in their systems that the countries and states need Ai developers. The laws needed to be expressed. California's AB Companies that develop AI systems are published in a high summary of the Dataset, which trained their systems. When it is central to compliance with the AI Act, companies are involved in a model-related operation.