Open Editor
Rout Khalaf, FT Editor, chooses stories that he likes to this booklet.
Soon before you meet Donald Trump, Sir Kiir Shmrmre was announced last week If we “keep our commitment to spending 2,5 percent of our GDP to protect yourself.
The Premier said that “when faced with the challenges that were in the Europe must do more because they defend them.” But the UK is so firmly that the market is so economical is the zone of the community by zero. This is not a bad response to challenges. It was true when it was made. It had a truer after the Friday meeting and voloyrmrmyrmyrmyrmyrmyrmy at the Oval Office. European protection is now dependent on Europe. The UK should be led.
It's been February 2024, I Commons House The published report is discussing that “there is a lot of energy that is determined within the armed UK forces”. According to To build the protection force in Europepublished by the London London London Lands for the Strategic Studies in November 2024, the situation is similar to other Europe.
Furthermore, these Iron Holes continue without having increasing expenditure due to safety over the past years. This is because the magnitude of the previous history. It is due to an emergency requirement to transfer to Ukraine over the past three years. This leaves a large hole of the Witnesses in Nato, including the UK, she has to fill it rapidly.
Due to the size and urgency of these pressures, expenditure will have to be very high. Note that was 5 percent of the UK GDP, or more, in the 1970s and 1980s. It may not have to be the longest term: Today's Russia is not the Soviet Union. But it may be necessary to get up as when it is built, especially if the US is withdrawal. It is the realistic funding of the increase in temporary investment. But if the security expenditure will be permanently high, the tax must increase, unless the government receives enough, doubt.
In time, high income tax will be the best way to share an early load to protect themselves. In order for work to jump, instead, when the US is blowing USAID. The UK has already spotting its GDP assignment used for help from 0,7 percent under the Castmaron of David, to 0.5 per cent under Boris Johnson. Now is 0.3 percent, near the half of the item They want to live.
To dispose of the most populous help is the wrong funding of self-references. Annens doddsMinister of Global Improvement, he was good to withdraw. The amounts of money has been exchanged. After all, it will grow in the world's evil and weaken the UK word in the world. The decision is the manifestation of the out and coward.
The fact is “Sorry to be divided” It is over in the war of the European war. The UK can and should spend more than the security. Besides doing so, it will not be able to understand the voice of the joint protection or protection. It should play a leading role in strengthening the European europe.
Fortunately, the UK is able to reality at the economic compensation for its investment. Historically, wars were the mother of new things. This appeared to be true in the second world war. “The origin of Israel's economy” began to his military service. Ukraine's people now have The War of the Drolare. John van Reenen, Chairman of the Economic Advanced Body of the EkchQuer Performing UK work, Rachel is alive, you have CO-at home on page To argue that 10% increase in safety and improvement is 4% in R percent on R & D. In Another page is entitledYou have contradicted that these resources are subject to open subsidies and competitive support competition competition. The most important part, however, is that the need to spend more seal should be viewed as above the need and more costs, though both are true. If it is done properly, it is also an economic opportunity.
Today, the UK gives a new grim grim. This is not possible to be temporary. As Russia is released and US withdrawn, the UK government should not pretend that nothing has changed has changed and fewer additional costs should be born. The Starmer should proclaim the public to note the things today. So far, you have been very strong.