New York judge Analisa Torres has decided that the woman of suing Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs the issue of raping her when she was 13 years old cannot be known yet.
On Thursday, Torres ruled that Jane Doe can remain anonymous, but has the right to reconsider the decision at a later date. If the case goes forward, Jane Doe may be required to disclose her identity, according to a court document obtained by Fox News Digital. Torres also noted that there is “a lot of interest” from the public about the case.
The judge also addressed the lawyers of Jay-Z (whose legal name is Shawn Carter) specifically in the court document.
“Carter's attorney's continued presentation of inflammatory statements and ad hominem attacks is inappropriate, a waste of judicial resources, and a strategy that will not benefit his client,” it said. Torres, referring to Jay-Z's lawyer, Alex Spiro.
WATCH ON FOX NATION: WHAT HAS DIDDY DONE?

The woman who accused Jay-Z of sexually abusing her when she was 13 has been granted anonymity. (Karwai Tang/WireImage)
“The court cannot speed up the judicial process just because counsel wants it,” he continued.
Earlier this month, the music star filed a motion to dismiss the rape case. He also asked the court to deny the plaintiff's request to proceed anonymously. Jay-Z was accused of raping a young child with Diddy at an MTV VMA after-party in 2000, documents said.
In his motion to dismiss, Jay-Z accused Texas Attorney General Tony Buzbee, who is Jane Doe's attorney, of running a “stealing saga – a saga whose purpose is base and measured in dollars.”
On Thursday, Buzbee told Fox News Digital, “Repeated attempts to discredit and discredit the attorney general is a failed strategy.”
“The presentation of Carter's attorney's relentless rhetoric of belligerence with inflammatory language and ad hominem attacks is inappropriate, a waste of judicial resources, and a tactic that will not benefit the client. his is good.”
Spiro did not respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
On December 16, Spiro spoke at Roc Nation headquarters in New York and said allegations against Jay-Z “obviously, it's a blatant lie.”
Spiro spoke in a recent NBC News interview with an unnamed Alabama a woman who admits to making “other mistakes” when it comes to recounting what happened at the VMAs after-party.

Jay-Z, left, and Sean “Diddy” Combs are both accused of raping a minor after the MTV VMAs in 2000, according to a lawsuit. (Kevin Mazur)
LIKE WHAT YOU READ? CLICK HERE FOR MORE EVENTS
Spiro wanted to make it known that this discrepancy “is not a small thing… If you look at the time, it is impossible that this could happen.”
“I want to make sure this is clear: When people create an account, whether it's on purpose or their mind is blank or something, they can get that basic part of the story right. They can always it repeats over and over again; this is what happened, that part will always spoil the details,” said Spiro Hollywood Reporter.

Alex Spiro is representing Jay-Z, whose legal name is Shawn Carter, during the trial. (Getty Images)
“(This was impossible. That's because this has never happened before,” he added).
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE FOR ITALIAN NEWS
Spiro said his client was “disgusted” by the situation.

Jay-Z is “disgusted” by the situation, according to his lawyer. (Monica Schipper/WireImage)
“He's outraged that someone would be allowed to do this, he'd be allowed to make a mockery of a system like this. He's outraged that this is hindering and preventing real victims from coming forward. He's outraged that that her children and her family have to deal with this. And she should be upset,” he said.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP