Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg promised to conduct a generalized general intelligence (Agi), which was ai that could not be able to have any work. But in a New policy documentMeta said that they had some situations that could not be released in the internal developed and significant AI system.
Meta identifies the two types of AI systems: “High risk” and “high risk” systems
Meta has the ability to help the different differences that the “dangerous” and “most important risks” systems develop “most important risks” systems. (A) In the proposed distribution situation, there is no need to be reduced in (a). “In contrast, high risk systems;
What kind of attacks are we talking about here? Meta, “The spread of the theatital theticks of corporation of corporation of corporation of corporation of corporation of the best trained corporation corporation gives a few examples. The list of potential catastrophes in the Metta's document is tired and tired. The company recognized;
It is a bit surprising, but Meta does not identify the danger of the system that the system is unsuccessful. Why? Meta evaluation science believes that the science is mostly sufficiently strong enough to determine the risks of the system.
The company said the company would restrict the right to enter the system in the system. If On the other hand, Meta said that if the Meta would implement the unsuspecting security to prevent unstable deterrents until the instability of instability was destroyed.
Meta's boundary framework said it would improve with any meta changing ai landscape Commitment to publish earlier The French AI AI's Donation Summit This month, the company responded to responding to criticism of the “Open” approach to the development of the system. Meta accepted its Ai technology with an open strategy Usually not open by an understood definition – Unlike companies like OPyai, choose to choose to choose their systems behind the API.
The open liberation approach for meta is a blessing and curse. Family of the Company's Company's Company's Family LobeMillions of downloads uploads uploads. But there is also llama Report Used at least US enemy to develop defense chatbot.
Publishing the Frontier AI framework is also intended to compare its open AI strategy with China AI Company byLSEK. Deep In addition, its systems make it open. However, the company's AI is a little protective and easily led to Generate poison and hazardous results.
“By thinking about making decisions about making decisions about making decisions about how to decide on how to make decisions about how to make decisions about how to decide on how to decide on how to make decisions about how to make decisions, the technology has maintained the adventure level for society. “
TechCrunch has a AI-Feest newsletter. Sign up here To get on your inbox every Wednesday.