The 2022 report includes 82 universities analysis, the indirect cost ratio they receive from the federal funding and the indirect cost ratio they receive from private sponsors such as Sloan Foundation, Gates Foundation and Chan Zuckerberg initiative. Ten of the schools in the analysis of the Heritage Fund did not confirm their indirect cost ratio to private sponsors, leaving 72 full items in the analysis of the report.
Of the 72 universities, the report declared that 67 private research funds have accepted non -percentage indirect research costs, which have been analyzed and searched as in the NIH notice. .
There is a tip?
Are you a current NIH employee or before, or a scientist was affected by this government? We want to hear from you. Using phones or computers does not work, contact our reporters safely on the signal at Mattreynold.45 and Emullin.06.
The Heritage Organization's report concludes that only three schools in the sample refuse to accept indirect cost ratio from private platforms at a lower rate than the schools they have negotiated with the Federal Government. . Those schools are the University of Alabama in Birmingham, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Michigan University.
The NIH notice mentioned the same three schools without determining the heritage fund as analytical source. It mentioned that Harvard requires an indirect cost insurance at least 15 percent from private sponsors and California Institute of Technology, which require an indirect cost of 20 percent. These examples also appear in the report of the Heritage Fund.
One of the authors of the report, senior researcher of the Jay Greene Heritage Fund, said he did not participate in the drafting of NIH but acknowledged that a paragraph of NIH announced it seems like a document. Refer to our 2022 report. Nih did not answer Wired's request.
A plan to cut indirect cost ratio in federal funding also appears in the 2025 project, the policy cost plan of the nearly thousand -page heritage organization for a second term of Trump president. . This market -based reform will help reduce the federal taxpayer of the left -wing agenda, read and read reports. During his presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly refused all links to the 2025 Heritage Organization and Project.
On Monday, A 22 state alliance Presenting a challenge of the legality of NiH's indirect cost reduction efforts.
Universities say the cap will hinder their important research capabilities. The discovery of new treatments will slow down, the opportunity to train the next generation of scientific leaders will be narrowed, and our country's scientific and technical capacity will be harmed. serious, Harvard President Alan Garber in a post on the university website.
Some universities will lose more than $ 100 million in Federal funding if the new funding limit is maintained. According to to statsWeill Cornell Medicine has brought $ 107 million indirect costs in 2022, a figure will drop to $ 23 million if this rate is 15 %.