'Open' model licenses are mostly related to restrictions. Often used to carry


Google announces the family of Gemma 3, the AI ​​model, the AI ​​model. It has rapidly obtained their impressive effectiveness. But as crab Of Builder Gemma 3 licenses were lamented on x.

It's not a unique problem for Gemma 3. Companies such as Meta also relevant to legal challenges for the legal licenses and companies that are legal to the standard licenses for their open-time models. Some companies; Especially small operations, Google and others can pull the “carpets to pull” carpets “by saying more complex with their business.

Limitations that are unlikely with the “Open 'AI Models are especially important for commercial adoption, especially for commercial adoption. Long-term organization He told TechCrunch to open all things and open the “bank strength” and open the “bank standards” resources. “When opening these models, the markets have enacted legal and practical obstacles that prevent businesses from unity in their products or services.

Model developers oppose industry licenses in open developers. Have reasons to release models under industrial licenses With Apache. AI Startup Cohehere it is clear It is intended to support science – but not commercial but not commercially – works on top of its models.

However, especially Gemma and Meta's llama llama licenses are limited to limiting the limitations that use models without fear.

Meta example, Developers are prohibited Using the “output or results of the LLama 3 models, using the” output or results of the habits “to improve the LLAMA 3 or” habits of the habits “, do not licensed Llama models without special license.

Gemma license Is generally less burdensome. But Google believes Google Google Google is Google. Prohibited use policy Or “laws and regulations.”

These terms are not just about the original Llama and Gemma models. Models based on Llama or Gemma must follow Llama and Gemma licenses. The story of Moraly trained in gemma manufactured in the synonym contains the form of moral patterns.

In the German research center in the German research camp, Research Deputy Florian brand; What you will believe in the tech orders what you – Gemma and Llama licenses, such as “transparent sources cannot be called.”

“Most companies have approval licenses such as Apache 2.0,” officials or non-money companies will keep the models in keeping the models with standard licenses. ”

Brand brand notes by AI mod mod modelings with a custom license like Google. But threat is often likely to prevent adoption.

“These restrictions affect the AI ​​ecosystem.

Han Chung Lee, director of Moody's Dearning Machin, agrees with licenses like “useless” in commercial situations. The Eric Tramel is a employee who is a employee used in AI Startup Gratil.

“The License of the Model License is concerned about the thumb width of the models that promotes models.” Imagine a special economic business for their customers. Should Lmama's Gemma-Data-Data-Data-Data Do it? What will be the effect for all of their lower clients? “

The fear of those who fear the people who fear the people who fear the majority of fear is the Trojan horse.

“The model of models (open) models can be transmitted, and the market may be like a solid distribution. So the market will be stuck with weakness and reliable apache 2.0 models.”

To be clear, some models have received a wide range of distribution between their strict licenses. Llama for instance Downloads hundreds of millions of millions The main corporations, including spotify, are added to products.

However, according to the Machine Learning and Society Learning from the Machine Start Face, the Machine Learning and Society Started in the AI ​​Startup. Even can be achieved. The Jewm stimulates google supports such as Google to open the license frameworks with the users “more directly.”

“If there is no test of the agreement on the term and the fact that many backgrounds have not been tested in the courts, all of them will be discovered in the legal grounds of the construction of successful commercial products.”

Vidal can integrate freely for AI modeling companies. It is urgently needed to associate with free association and sharing without repairing and sharing without sharing.

“The current AI ideal licensed system is complicated. It is filled with a number of tight words and open speech demands,” Vidal said. Instead of reseting 'Open' to fit the corporation interest, AI should build the Open Open Source Pritlips to create an actual open ecosystem. “



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *