On Tuesday, the British Court of Appeals will launch a two-day hearing in the legal work of Prince Harry in connection with the return of open-funded security for his family during his trips to England
Harry and his wife Meghan Markle, said they were go down An official committee from the royal roles and the Britain to leave in 2020, the couple has decided not to be eligible for the protection of the police that are normal to the royal family.
Harry complicates this decision. O Lost the previous stage In February last year, the lawsuit, but one judge then gave him permission to apply Judgment on limited grounds. Although the judge is “without hesitation”, he said, “without hesitation”, he said.
The London Court will hear the arguments of the three judge Harry's lawyers and withdraw protection against the official policy. If the court decides, part of the case will be conducted private due to security processes and evidence evaluation.
What is the case?
On February 28, 2020, the court decided not to meet the public financing in the UK after Harry and Meghan's financing in the UK in England and a new life in Canada. In March 2020, they moved from Vancouver to California.
The decision was made by a body called Ravec and Public Figure Protection Committee known as RAVEC, which brings together the police and members of the Royal House as Ravec. Ravec, royal family and terrorism, are responsible for taking security measures for other UK other figures, which are specifically risky of obsessive behavior or other threats.
In the first stage of Harryin, in 2022, his lawyers heard in London in London, he said the committee did not have any opportunity for his existence and his decision. After the discussions on the security provision, he wrote a letter to a civil servant who expressed confidence and concern. February 10, 2020, in 1997, his mother, his mother, who was killed in a car accident in 1997, celebrated her mother in 1997.
Harry has increased its family due to the “additional layers of additional racism and extremism” and security from the Metropolitan Police in London has been important. The deficiency of the meeting could “protect my family and some penalty form to protect my family.”
What happened so far?
Harri, in September 2021, Ravik claimed that he could not review the main factors of the Committee and was not fairly transparent and was not quite transparent, in September 2021.
In the first stage of the case, in July 2022, the court heard the testimonies offered by Harry “To pay the price of safety measures or to finance or actively finance “himself, but Ravec decided to be wrong.” The house office told the court that the committee said that the protection was not guaranteed to “get protective security as protected by the state, the protection was not guaranteed to finance the public.”
RavEC's special financing was allowed to allow the police to be allowed to be allowed to train in the UK, and the police were not regularly armed and an intensive specialist training for the role.
Harry has lost a certain legal problem about the financing decision and a high judicial judge in 2023 rejected the case In more places in February 2024.
In three months, it was allowed to complain, but only related to legal points regarding the failure to violate their policy.
While the work continued, Harri had several times to the British, including the body of his grandmother Elizabeth II for the contribution of King Charles III and for private security.
The Supreme Court heard that Harry's representatives appealed to Ravec for the protection of public safety for each visit.
When will we know the verdict?
On Wednesday, the two-day court hearing, the Court of Appeals may declare the authorities in the same day or “Reserve Judgment” means “reserve judgment” for weeks or months before announcing their decisions.
Any side of the losing side can apply to allow the British Supreme Court to allow appeal. As permission is not automatically issued, judges must decide whether there is any perspective.
The British Home Office said he could not comment on direct court claim, but “The protective security system of the United Kingdom is serious and proportional.