- As the Silicon and Washington valley forms close tiesTech leaders gave advice on how the government could design better and faster. The founders and early investors of advocacy technology said the Pentagon should reduce the times of shooting and raise its levels of risk tolerance to promote new weapons.
After years of trying to enter the Byzantine defense industry of the American government, the silicon valley eventually gets its place.
Crops Start new defense From the valley they head to Washington at a time when the Pentagon is interested in new technology. Many leading data from technology Reserved President Donald Trump's reform, stressing a New guarantees Among the industry that was previously known for supporting Democrat.
A recent meeting in the national capital showed a new a close relationship between technology and government. The Hill and Valley platform on Wednesday showed executives of top advocacy companies like Palantir's Alex Karp and SensorBrian Schimpf, rubbing the shoulders with government officials as national security adviser Mike Waltz and also members of the Senate weapons services such as Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Mike Round (RS.D.), and Jack Reed (Dr.I.).
Contrary to the backdrop of the American and Chinese geography contests, the Technology Leaders' conversation to the government to take The page from his playbook found a welcome audience.
The White House “is completely committed to adjusting the way we get technology” to improve the American army, Waltz said, the day before he left his role as a national security adviser.
Trump signed several Executive instructions That could point out how the defense department gets new protection systems. The establishment of defense technology had long maintained that current channels left them unable to compete with existing army contractors felt less productive but deep relations in the Pentagon.
The executive instructions are “following things that seem very costly, give too little and take too long,” Waltz told the audience during the named panel Arsenal reimagined: Dod design for the 21st century battlefield. “We can fill this venue with defense and tank adjustment reforms, but you have a president and you have a leadership team that are all gas, no brakes, and sometimes we help them control.”
In the middle of the conversation there was a long -term Pentagon trend, bidding processes and research projects, and dangerous culture that made it difficult for Dod to take place on experimental technology.
“There is a fundamental fact that the invention is bad and chaos,” Palantir's chief technology officer Shyam Sankar.
On Friday, the White House presented a 2026 Federal Budget That's with $ 1.01 trillion In DOD funding. Activation of advocacy technology Seek themselves in an unusual position to be frustrated with DOD activities, which they consider to be stodgy and anti-meritocracy, and, at the same time doing his business. Now, due to the close relationship of the silicon valley and the Trump administration, it seems that they found political partners for the evolution they are seeking.
“You still shoot up on”
But even if DOD opens its purchase process for technology and startup companies, they will still face a complex market, according to the palantir karp.
“You are still shooting, but shooting and shooting like Mount Everest when they drop bombs on you is a different story,” said Karp, whose company has succeeded he charged the American army In 2016 by blocking it from the tender of the Government Agreement. That argument is widely considered to have open Pentagon doors to the silicon valley.
Anduril's Schimpf suggested that the Pentagon should set the major orders and the beginning of the defense. “If you buy things, capital will flow,” he said. “Buy items at that rate, which move the needle and create opportunities to enter the board.”
Without a guarantee of major deals, Anduril “has simply written” to promote new versions of products such as air-to-air missiles that he does not believe he will find a buyer, Schimpf has been added. “I don't think in 20 years anyone would buy any air-conditioned missile we did, because they are already volunteering” to buy from someone else, he said.
Emil Michael, Trump's nominee for the Undersecretary of defense for research and engineering, believes the Pentagon can rely heavily on the defense systems designed and more transparent for existing commercial products when searching for new purchase technology. “We don't need things that are always,” he said.
Michael, who has not yet been proven for his role in the Pentagon, said Dod could also benefit from looking at the opportunities to save time, not just money. “Saving time is not something that is natural in DOD's business style, (which is) on reducing the risk to its small part at the expense of moving as soon as possible.”
Failure quickly, failure often
In a discussion on promoting new technologies, conversations often turned into one of the mantras of Silicon Valley: rapid failure, often failure. The idea, which is the main of technological cultures, is that most failed products do not matter as long as the last version works.
“Missing does not matter. It is the magnitude of the success that is worth it,” said Venture Vinod Khosla's capital when asked about how to make the government fit and take risks.
Palantir's Sankar suggested an increase in competition between Defense Department staff to create, so they would have a “motivation for bureaucrat two doors under the corridor.” He considers Dod to be a monopsony that prevented the invention from being a buyer of defense systems only in the market.
Instead, Sankar suggested that they have many program managers tasked with managing the project, and the contract finally went to the one who gave the best results. “They would wake up every day as competitive Americans trying to kill each other,” he said. “There will be motivation if 'let us go quickly. Let's do this better.” “
Speakers at the conference said the ongoing geography tensions and the AI and China's hand races have increased the urgency in the matter.
“And when you are in the AI race when every invention can lead to tens of billions, if not hundreds of billions, worth the creation of value – you think of valuable formulations as a better defense, shield, more restriction – every minute you lose is expensive,” said Michael.
This story was previously shown Bahati.com
Source link