The debate with the Indian Badminton National Trainer Pullae Gothindand has debate with his statement. His claim mixed mixed reactions – some, and some, including Investor Dilip Kumar, others supported his perspective.
Kumar emphasized a note of X (previous Twitter), the harsh reality of professional games. “Gopi is right. The reality is larger – compared to those who do so, and even the end of their occupations,” “there is a game, power laws,” ” Made 10% of the players with 90% of the money. Everyone else is a numeric. “
Kumar pointed out that there is a misleading narrative with sarcastic talents. “We'd like to read and watch the Underneath View – It's a survival of survival. The real question is still nothing. Why? “He said.
He said most of the top 1% outside the top 1% outside the struggle. “You don't get a sponsorship, and you don't have financial security, and after your career is over the early 20 or early 30's – you will move the next one.
Kumar was different from the sports system in India with the developed countries who provide structured league, college scholarships and post-careful opportunities. “If you were not an Olympic champion, you can still earn a living as coach, analyst, coach or a small league. The system does not dismiss you as you don't have in the top 1%,” he said.
An engineer who fails in a starter can still find a job, but he likened this to another career roads, as a failed athlete often argued, but often no backup. “In many countries, the success of the game without strong sport ecosystems, the success of the game is successful with the wealth. You cannot be an athletic, unbearable, unbearable.
Kumar said the problem lies in the system, and not athchers. “To pursue sports at the moment, it is like telling them to buy the lottery tickets as an investment strategy. It is not the one but not from athletes.
He emphasized that a strong sport structure will benefit beyond the champions than society. “A great sports system does not create champies – it creates a nation, disciplined, disciplined and competitive people. This is the foundation of true development,” he wrote.
Drawing with cricket, Kumar raised its well established eco system. “There is a full bulk ecosystem – Academy, domestic leagues, sponsorship and post-retarded occupations – District cricket, Ranji, IP .LLL. Commentary, Training, Approves
In contrast, he pointed out that there are no identified structures in other games. “Now see every other sport. If you don't go to the Olympics, you have become a industry. It is also necessary. It also requires.
Kumar concluded for a systemic reform: “Everyone should not be a gold medal. But they should still have a viable vocal profession.”