One of the two documented immigrants with previous beliefs detained by American immigration and customs skin (ICE) internal investigations on internal security (HSI), approaches the vehicle, in the home parking lot of Home Depot in Tucson, Arizona, USA, January 26, 2025.
Rebecca Noble Reuters
. Supreme Court On Monday, he allowed Trump's administration to resume quick deportations of some immigrants to countries other than their own without their own warning and a chance to challenge them because they can be tortured or killed.
The court raised warrant Issued in April by the judge of the Federal District Court in Massachusetts, which blocked the practice that was introduced after executive order signed by the president Donald Trump in January.
The Monday decision of the Supreme Court will remain in the case of dismissal in the case by the Trump administration.
Three liberal judges of the Supreme Court did not refer to the decision.
“In matters of life and death, it is best to be careful,” wrote one of those judges, Sonia Sotomayor.
“In this case, the government adopted the opposite approach,” wrote Sotomayor.
“He deported one plaintiff to Guatemala, despite the fact that the immigration judge stated that he could face torture there,” she wrote. “Then, with a clear violation of the court order, he deported six more to South Sudan, a nation that the Department of State considers to be too dangerous for everyone except the most critical staff.”
“Careful intervention of the District Court in a timely manner prevented the third set of unlawful removals to Libya,” wrote Sotomayor.
“Instead of allowing our court collaborators to manage this dispute with high rates with care and attention it clearly requires, the Tribunal is now intervening to grant a government relief in an emergency, which has been repeatedly opposed”, “said.
“I cannot join the abuse of the court's fair recognition.”
These are the latest news. Refresh updates.