Scott Bosent, the Treasury Secretary, joins the US News Room to join the “US News Room” for a 50 % possible tariff in the European Union, 25 % of Apple tariffs, possible Senate change in “Big Bill, Beautiful” Trump and Pressure to Modernize IRS.
A federal judge this week rejected an emergency petition with the aim of stopping the president Donald Trump Tariffs for vacuum cleaner, punishment for the US International Trade Court for further investigation.
The US Regional Judge T. Kent Wetherell II, a fixed company, rejected a fixed company based in Florida to continue his challenge over Trump's tariffs and agreed that the case should be heard by the US International Trade Court, pointing out that the case does not mean that the case is in the court because CIT has already taken almost the same.
The US Treasury Secretary Scott Bosent and US President Donald Trump appear to appear at the White House's digital asset summit at the White House State Dining Room on March 7, 2025. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images)
He also appeared to be under the international law of emergency economic powers or IEEPA has the authority to unilaterally impose extensive tariffs for reasons other than rising income.
The decision is the first time Federal Judge Apparently, Trump claims to impose extensive tariffs for reasons other than increased income by claiming Trump's 1970s law. It is also a close victory for the Trump administration seeking to transfer its cases to a New York -based court.
US International Trade Court with Trump in Tariff File
Traders work on March 28, 2025 in New York City on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). (Spencer Platt / Getty Images)
In a series of petitions across the country, the plaintiffs claimed that Trump has inappropriately used the International Economic Emergency Power (IEPA) law as a basis for implementing new import costs.
But Wetherell seemed to feel different. He said Trump has the power to approve the tariffs, the question he said, “effectively responded to 50 years ago” by a US history against international Yushida, a case filed by a Japanese Zip company under Nixon's government.
Judge Waterlele said Trump's rational reason for tariffs, which includes preventing drug flow to the United States and resolving the so -called “business deficit” with China, is sufficient to meet the IEPA citing conditions.
“Similarly, the declared target Tariffs “In this case, helping to prevent illegal drug flow to the United States and removing trade imbalances is underway, not to increase revenue,” Judge Waterl said. “
But victory can be short -lived.
It is still unclear whether Trump will have a margins in that court, though it has already been more compassionate with the government.
Federal judges in New York and Texas block Trump's deportation after Scottish ruling
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bosent has focused a trade deal with China. (Photo by Andrew Harnic / Giti Pictures)
Panel rejected the three requested judges earlier this year by a group of small businesses who were immediately stopped Trump tariffs Forcing, the plaintiffs were unable to show the possibility of suffering “immediate and irreparable harm” as a result of economic punishment.
But it has been 50 years since the CIT, then known as the Customs Court and Patent Registrar, decided whether the president has the authority to impose tariffs.
There is also “the difference between what happened in the early 1970s, and unhappy a small Japanese zip company, and a government that wants to use the standards that Congress has been vaguely set up” of what makes up a national emergency, David H. Feldman, an economist and Professor William and Maryam, told Fox News in an interview.
“If the courts are finally fully struggling and saying that this statute means what the President thinks, then we have descended into a world,” where the commander -in -law can make these decisions with hustle and cravings, or as he is suitable for solitary confinement. “This means that there will be no” investigation into the presidential power to manipulate markets, “he said.
Weterell seemed to think so.
Click here to get the Fox News application
“The argument in Yoshida is convincing, and the court does not see any reason that this does not apply to IEEPA because the IEPA operational language is the same as the operational language in the puppy,” he said.
The verdict is among the disadvantages of lawsuits seeking to block or pauses Trump's close acts, including petitions aimed at restricting DOGE, or the government's “efficiency” agency led by Elun, Trump's ban on birth citizenship and challenging tariffs, including many more.