President Trumps suggestion The United States will eliminate the two million Palestinians in Gaza and eliminate two million Palestinians living there, and the serious violation of international law, experts. As the details of the proposal appears, the list of potential violations becomes clearer.
Mr. Trump, in the news interview of Fox on Monday, said that Gaza has Palestinians under his plan would not be allowed to return to the areaAn important principle of international law, as well as a violation with a component of other international crimes.
His latest comments hit His assistants Roll back the initial offer In fact, claiming that Gaza's population offers a temporary, voluntary evacuation, a scenario that can be legally protected.
“Trump, casually converts major international crimes into political offers,” he said. “It simply suggests to violate or disrupt the principles of international law.”
Mandatory deportation
The obligatory deportation or delivery of a violent civilian population is a violation of international humanitarian law, war crime and humanity.
This forbidden Since the Liber code, the United States has been part of the civil warfare to the rules of military operations. Mandatory Deportation, Numerous provisions of the Geneva Conventions in which the United States and the Nuremberg Court were determined as a war crime after World War II.
The Roman regulations, established by the International Criminal Court, both warfare crimes, as well as a crime against mankind. And if the displacement is targeted by a certain group based on ethnic, religious or national identity, which is the persecution – an additional offense.
(If the International Criminal Court shall be held in Gaza, because Palestine has known as a party in Gaza, it is so true that it is so true that the United States is committed by citizens, and it is not a member of the Rome.)
At 4 press conferences, where Mr Trump was asked on February 4, the population of Gaza said, “All,” he said, “All,” he said, “I'd think they would be excited,” he said. If they do not want them to go, he said, “I don't think it will not tell me anything.”
Allies and enemies in the world, including France, Germany, Ireland, Spain, Turkey, Russia and China, immediately and unequivocally condemned the proposal of Mr. Trump. “We should not worsen the problem in search of a solution,” he said. “It is very important to remain faithful to the field of international law. It is important to prevent any ethnic cleansing.”
Right to return
Mr. Trump's Fox says that Gaza did not allow Gaza to return to the population, said: Civilians are temporarily legal to be temporarily legal for themselves.
In a ceasefire, because of the accident, the unexploded bombs are very dangerous to damage catastrophic damage to civil needs, as well as unexploded bombs, but also asylum, water and power.
However, Mr. Trump was said to be not intended to allow the population to return to the population on Tuesday, and even after the treatment of these threats and the area could not be legally legally legally.
The right to “return law” has been approved in the international community for civil and political rights, which has signed and ratified and ratified and ratified the United States, including the United States, including the United States.
This principle was also one of the most controversial issues of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Israel refused to allow about 700,000 Palestinians, which fleeing the Palestinians' Nakba or disaster, which referred to as a massacre of Nakba or a disaster.
It will be allowed to return to the area, whether these refugees and generations, which are already a number of refugees and generations.
In addition, the right of the Israelites are also a for decades To claim the area more than Israel than a future Palestinian state, the West Bank and Settlements within the Gaza.
The seizure of the area
On Sunday, Mr. Trump, US journalists about Gaza's Air Force, said that the United States is a “great real estate site” and reiterated the proposal by saying that the United States is a great real estate “.
It would be a violation of international law for the United States for the fact that international law is constantly buying the territory of Gaza. The ban on a nation that forcibly annexes the area is one of the most Important and basic principles International law.
“There is a clear rule,” he said. Marko Milanovic, the International Legal Professor of International Law in the University of Reading in the UK “You cannot conquer the territory of another.”
It is rare for states to break the rule. As Russia is in occupation to Ukraine, at least tends to claim the excuses of law. Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed Ukraine's Russian-Boili population should have occupied by the Ukrainian government to protect the genocide. Although this approval is fake, it has paid a lip service to a deeper principle that it will be illegal for his sake.
In Gaza, this violation will be partially dependent on the fact that Marko Milanovic, a state of international law, which is considered a state of public consideration, and the University of Palestine in Britain. The United Nations recognizes Palestine as permanent observer and recognizes Palestinian statehood since 193, but there is no US and Israel.
However, although the Gaza is not considered a part of a state, the United States is still violating the right to self-determination of the civilian population. The International Justice Court ruled twice that the Palestinian people were right in Gaza.
“If you take it without their consent, you violate the rights of self-determination,” Professor Milanovich said. “There's really no doubt about it.”
The role of international law
Mr. Trump was not interested in the proposal by the authorities that cancel the international law system, and it overtherses these institutions.
Last week declared sanctions against the International Criminal Court. Side TuesdayThe United States has signed an executive order for the general review of the United States on its obligation on this global body, and to participate in the financing and participation of the United States. He also took the United States from the US Council of Human Rights.
Although Mr. Trump's Gaza Plan is the result, our relations with international law can lead to serious consequences for the interests of the United States.
Considering the value of these rules, Mr. Trump was able to send a strong message to defend them in other contexts such as Taiwan's potential Chinese occupation.
“If the conquest is normalized and the legal rule is just a world, we live in a world in a world, we live in an incredibly dangerous world for Americans,” he said.