Trump's Doj program to rebuild Google is damaging consumers, national security.

Google The purpose of the Ministry of Justice's efforts to maintain its search engine is to repair its search engine just a few days before the federal court hearing, while senior executives describe the proposed government reforms as “highly loading” and potential risks for consumers, jobs and national security prospects.

A senior executive at Google previewed the company in an interview with Fox News Digital, noting that the solutions provided by the Ministry of Justice are “very broad” and “miles beyond” that the court ordered in August, when the US district judge ordered the government to act online.

The framework of the Ministry of Justice's proposed solution includes stages such as the Chrome transfer, the Google Internet browser, and possibly Android. Google Requirements to Disclose Consumer Data and Consumer Search Data with other companies for the next 10 years, Including companies Located outside the United States. And extensive “self -prevention” options, which limit the user's access to innovative integrations, including AI, Google Translate and Google Lens, which allows users to use their own photos or their camera.

Zuckerberg tolerate the early day of the meta -monopoly trial

In The Ministry of Justice was charged Google to maintain its monopoly over the years by paying internet browsers and smartphone manufacturers such as Apple and Samsung to automatically display their search engine on their devices.

And while Google challenges the court's decision and intends to revise the case, the company also sees within the framework of the heavy solutions that the government has sent to the court.

On the eve of the 15-day proof session, which begins in Washington, DC on Monday, Walker expressed Google's concerns with the government program-given that, in their view, the Ministry of Justice's proposal to break down the Google search engine is to go beyond “relief by the federal court judge.

“We're very worried about Doj's offer,” Walker told Fox News. “We think this will harm American consumers, our economy, our technology leadership, even national security.”

Google's executives have described it as “intense offer”, which puts security and privacy for millions of people. Cool investments in AI; And it hurts innovative services, including Firefox Mozilla, which depends on Google to put searching.

WHISTLEBLOWER to the Senate Committee that Meta has weakened US national security for cozy to China

Suggested reforms from the Ministry of Justice will “lead to the unprecedented government that damages consumers, developers, and small jobs – and endangers the global economic and technology leadership of the US exactly at the moment it endangers the most need.” Said in a blog post Shortly after the release of the DOJ offer.

In addition to the steps listed above, DOJ's proposal includes extensive options for “self-prophecy”, which makes users access to innovative integrations currently in Google Search-including AI, Google Translate and newer Google lenses, the feature that allow users to use their own photo or camera.

This week, the company made an alternative therapeutic offer, which says that it was more accurately searching for search distribution contracts at the heart of the anti -monopoly case.

“The main finding here was that we were paying for search distribution in ways that made competition harder for competitors,” Walker told Fox News Digital. “So our suggestions are dealing with it and say,” Well, well, we will set up our contracts so that we don't pay for all the access points on a device. ”

This includes shorter contracts for browser companies, Like apples And Mozilla; New Android contracts provide additional flexibility and option to pre -load multiple search engines. He said and other important steps to compete the prospects.

“Overall, Google's proposed solutions are much greater than the specific behavior that the court has in charge of the case and gives competitors a chance to innovate and compete in the future while maintaining Google innovation incentives,” the tech giant wrote in his court case.

Now, the solution sent to the federal court needs it to take specific steps to correct these perceived mistakes.

Get Fox Business on a move by clicking here

The victory of the Ministry of Justice in this case is remarkable last year – this was the first successful anti -monopoly petition by the United States against a large technology company since the United States against Microsoft. In 2001

But it is unclear whether it will be as successful as the relief program.

“This is like a backward case,” the things that happened 10 years ago during unprecedented innovation are felt, “Walker said.

Both Google Lawyers and Justice Lawyers and Justice are re -gather again on Monday for a treatment session in Washington, DC.