2024 is a busy year for legislators (And lobbyistsIn particular, in California, especially in California, which signed the Gavin Newsom, especially in California. 18 AI New Law While Vetoing High-Profile AI.
2025 only sees activities at the state level Weatherford Mark Worksford. In Weatherford, “Supergage Service” in the state and federal steps has been made in his words. He served as assistant elders for Prime Minister Barack Obama for Prime Minister Barack Obama for the state of California and Colorado.
WEATHERFORD says that in recent years he has done different jobs with job opportunities in recent years. The last fall was joined with a synthetic data company Straight one His policy and standards as its vice president.
So what do he think of the coming of the AI rules coming in?
This interview is elected length and clearly.
The goal is to view the contents of the congressional paintings related to the content that relevant social media-related content. How positive ones can legislators find the name they need to make a decision in the rules?
Well, I'm very trustworthy they can get there. I'm a schedule to get the little confidence in that place. You know, AI is changing daily. I am motivating me that the issues we are talking about a month ago Imagine that it has changed to another month. So I believe that the government will reach there. But they guide people,
Earlier this week, the United States House of Representatives had a business group that they started about a year ago, and it was about fake intelute. Is a task group They published the report – Well, it took a year to do this. This is a 230 page report. I'm Wading right now. (Weatelyford and I first spoke in December)
It is usually two different organizations that make a policy and legislative sausage. . It's been a long time for a long time, and how much will everything go on?
It sounds like looking at your point of view. This is right?
I am completely believed. I mean, in California, the Gavin Newsom signed the 12 legislative laws that there was something to do with AI. (Again, Techcrunch's number is 18. ) He really needs Bed Bed in the AI. It really slows down.
In fact, I gave a talk to the California California cyber security summit. I mentioned a little bit of the legal provision across the state. It has introduced the state level over 400 years ago. So there's a lot there.
And I think it is a big concern in technology generally in technology. How does the Harry Coon use (reference) to all these different things? There is this (the situation) of everybody doing everyone's own thing in T. Because they will have to figure out. How do they adapt to different laws and regulations?
I think it would be a lot more movement in the state, I hope this is a little bit in mind. We must follow these diverse rules.
I have never heard of that expression. But most people would be my next question. What incentives must the states be infected with their laws and regulations?
Honestly, it is not compatible with the rules and regulations to harmonize the rules.
But let's take a strategic plan approach between the states, “let's take a strategic plan approach to all such states. This is impossible.
Other states regarding a general approach. Do you think that the leader of California can follow?
Most people don't want to hear this, but pushing the envelope that made people in California.
The 12 journalists of the administrator use data to train websites from pornography across the map. They relate to the direction forward there. Were pretty perfect.
My understanding is that they target and overcome the rules that are overcome and focus on specific measures.
I can see both sides. The bill was initially partially driving the bill, but the cost of what you do. So there is a balance there.
I will fully expect that I will fully expect to be fully expected (in 2025)
And your meaning is like the news that you have told the home in the federal level.
Well I don't know, it depends on how much emphasis is emphasized on the Congress (New) Congress. I think I'm going to see what I read. Reading I read and reading it is to focus on the minority. However, in many respects of respect, the CEOs in the technology and cyber security environment is a passionate issue that is good for everyone.
I'm not a big auditory of the rules, there are many resources that happen with different legislations. But at the same time, the safety and security of the society is with AI, and I think there is a place for additional rules.
You mentioned being a giant issue. My feelings are a surgery, and it is not always possible to predict.
That's a great point, whether or not the geographical position wants to admit whether we admit or accept it.
Obviously, this is a place where Gretel works in Gretel, but the company believes, but the company has more confidence.
may be. One of the reasons I'm here is that I believe that the synthetic data is the future of AI. There is no AI when there is no data. The quality of the data has become a issue like the pool of data. Make sure the privilege of exclusion and remove bias and eliminate bias and take advantage of the ratio of various proportions. We believe that the elements data is the answer. Actually, 100% believe it.
It's about policy. It is directly, but I think it has policy impacts, but I think there are other folks you recognize the problems you are saying.
Sure, this is the technical part of the conversation. Our customers feel like we can solve it. If This is the concept of flywheel that produces bad information. If If you give a bad information, it is getting worse and worsened to this flywheel, and it is getting worse. This has solved the problem gee.
Trump-align-aligned figures in the Silicon Valley Ai “warning about” censorship “ – Companies have a variety of weights and supervisors that are around the content of the specialist AI. Do you think it is possible to be adjusted? Should it be?
About AI Censorship concerns. The government will take action when the administration of the administrative lever who can hang out for the society.
However, searching for a comfortable spot between a reasonable content complement and strict censorship will be a challenge. It is a unanimous way that the entrance will be a module operandi, the Modus operandi will be clearly determined. Intergregation coordination; We should look forward to some guidance.
I want to get back to this question that I can be similar to the good Ai Regulation. When talking about AI about AI, it is amazing the most wonderful technology when it goes to save the world or destroy the world. About the potential and risks of technology. There are many different opinions. How can a piece of single piece or many AI rules cover?
I think I have to be very careful to manage the SPRAPL of AI. We have already met with deep deep aspects. At the moment, high schools and young children are now worried about seeing the deepest moments that cause deep-time children, which causes the turtle the trubble and the tribuncture. So I think there is a place for controlling laws gallery that controls the fact that people do not violate the existing intelligence.
I think we have to remember our second nature when we talk to our family in the technology, and we do not have a clue that is a text that is talking about most of the time. People don't want people to feel over and over again.
But on the other hand, I told you to talk to me with me, and I was a bit confusing with AI's future. I see a lot of goodness. We will think we have a couple of years for two years with most people. Up around AI.