Ref Watch: Var Frightened to be full of Judge Michael Oliver's decision on the Red Carton Myles Lewis-Skelly, says Stephen Warnock | Novske vesti


Ex-premiere League Dermot Gallock and Stephen Warnock analyze Myles Lewis-Skelly's controversial red card in Arsenal's victory over Wolves in Molineux.

Incident: Arsenal's Myles Lewis-Skelly is percingly displayed flat red card by Michael Olivera Suca for Fauling Matty Doherty near the edge of the wolf box.

Darren England was a decision “checked and confirmed”, with a varie that is considered Lewis-Skelly to do “serious Faul Game.”

Dermot says: “I think the disintegration is promising attack. It is my opinion and other encounters see it differently.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video device

Feel free to watch: points out from wolves' match against arsenal in the Premier League

“Lewis-Skelly realizes that Doherty Gota and his priority is to stop him quickly, and he comes out.

“It's a very cynical offense, but not a red ticket.

“It's not the worst decision in the world like people say.

“Judge Michael Oliver feels, and he still feels, to bring him down his Achilles, said the judges now said that the accessories with a bright with Achilles must be a red card.

“I don't think it works. It happens very quickly.

“But for me I think a yellow card to stop promising attacks. Is the challenge with brutality? Is he with malice? Did he get intensity and speed? I don't think so.”

Warnock: Var was scared to roll over Oliver's decisions

Stephen Warnock on Sky Sports News:

“I don't think that's red – I also don't think it's the worst decision we've ever seen in football. Enough of this during the weekend and some people pass on it.

“I think that's the wrong decision. I think it's an ankle offense more than anything. It's a cynical offense, a tactical offense, but there's no malignance.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video device

Jamie O'Hara and Jay Brusroyd are waged on a discussion around the controversial red card Lewis-Skelly

“Yes, catch him with his carvings, ever so a little, but he didn't hit him.

“My biggest thing is why she didn't go to Var or why Var didn't ask for Michael Oliver to go to the screen and look at the situation and talk about it? The team played for me.”

“We still get this hierarchical conversation.

“Michael Oliver is a judge; Var Booth does not want to overturn his decision because they are scared that the main guy and our chief is and I think that still exists that element of that conversation.

“It's still a problem that a lot of people mentioned this weekend, rightly or wrong.”

Why didn't Var intervened?

Former Premier League Dermot Gallagher on Sky Sports News:

“I can't answer that.

“If Var said he goes to the screen and see, see what you think. It is great in principle, but it is not part of the protocol.

“It must be that Var thinks it's clear and obvious mistake, then recommends the judge to go to the screen.

“What happens next is in the judge. He went to the monitor, maybe he held his soil well. Maybe he still thought it was a red card. He still has all the possibilities.

“It didn't happen and follow up caused a massive, mass debate. She also caused some very toxic and unnecessary tracking.”

“It's just a mistake”

Former Premier League Dermot Gallagher on Sky Sports News:

“Frame freezing images are great for contact. That's all it is. Shows you where boot is based.

“I think Michael Oliver had an optical illusion. He looks down and he sees that the accessory comes in. He thinks the poles descended down the Achilles.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video device

Mikel Arts says “Wild” is on a decision

“You are not even when you look at different angles, you can see it. But when you show the photo, everything changes.

“He still pics shows the first four speeds, intensity, where he comes from and where he goes.

“I feel like Oliver. He made a true decision given his experience and his knowledge. He is one of the best judges in the world. He did not bring that decision from anything, but what he sees he was right., He did it He continued with the games. At that time he took a lot of abuse and then he had to judge the rest of the game.

“According to his opinion, he probably thinks he's got him right.” In my opinion, it's just a mistake, but that's all it is. “

'Vitriol sent in oliver coward

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video device

The Sača Panel discussed abuse that Michael Oliver received after the decision on sending Lewis-Skelly against wolves

Stephen Warnock on Sky Sports News:

“This is an opinion – his opinion. Whether correct or wrong, you have no right to go to social media and thus vent your rage in that way.

“We get things all the time – that's just our opinion. We get all kinds of things on social media. People think they're entitled to it, it's just a society and the way he is currently.

“If they stood in a room with that person and they faced them, they wouldn't say a word. It's cowardly, it's pathetic.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *