Behind the whistle, former Chris Foy Chris Foy Premier passes through the choice of key decisions for the game from the weekend EFL action.
Behind the whistle aims to give an estuary to EFL clubs insight into the review of decision-making, and also clarifying certain calls for the provision of understanding how to interpret the laws of the game.
As part of the regular feature in Heavenly Sports after the match of the match, Foy will be there to run you through some judging things in EFL …
Swansea 0-2 Coventry
Incident: Goal scored, Possible handball (Swansea)
Decision: Goal Prohibited, Handball
Foy says: “It is good to see the speed of reaction and determination shown from the judge to identify this handball offense.
“As the ball comes from the corner, it clearly hit Swansea no. 5 Before the teammates run him into the back of the net. Here is a key judgment if the handball is for a misdemeanor, as accidental handball would not be penalized because Swansea no 5 does not score.
“Because the hand is unnatural and raised position, making the body larger, the goal is properly excluded for a handball offense.”
Watford 0-1 Norwich
Incident: Possible punishment and red card (Norwich)
Decision: Free blow and caution
Foy says: “The judge has several important decisions that would make here.
“First, he must decide whether no offense in Norwiche does not, not outside the box or not. Thanks to his movement and positioning, it can correctly identify that the contact is made out of the box and is free-to Norwich.
“Then he must decide whether the misdemeanor denies the apparent opportunity (Dogso). From the replay, we can see that Norwich attacker has the ball under the goal, and to have an obvious chance for a scammer.
“The judge should therefore show the Watford Player Red Card for Dogso.”
Crawley 1-2 Wrexham
Incident: Possible offense under construction to target (Wrexham)
Decision: Naked
Foy says: “Wrexham was lucky about this goal to stand, because their not 38 obviously violates his opponent before he moves the ball into the net.
“As the ball plays wide, the judge should be a scan in the middle to see what is happening in a crowded box.
“Focusing on a player that crosses the ball inside, lacking sustainable holding of Wrexham NO 38 on his opponent. Withdrawal was in a misdemeanor and a misdemeanor. Therefore he would board the threshold.”
1-0 Bolton reading
Incident: Possible punishment, handball (reading)
Decision: Awarded penalty
Foy says: “Although this seems a little harmless, it is an accurate decision a reward judge to read the penalty for handball.
“As the ball floats into that area, Bolton # 29 does not go to head ball, and establishes contact with the ball extended by hand.
“The hand is in an unnatural and unjustified position, so punishment is the correct outcome.”
Doncaster 2-1 Mk Dons
Incident: Goal reached, Possible offside (Doncaster)
Decision: Naked
Foy says: “Occurred decisions in which defenders increase and try to play attackers in offside can be difficult for auxiliary judges judge, but he gets this in one place.
“While Doncaster No.
“When the picture is covered in and in such a tempo, it makes it difficult to judge, but he works well here.”